1. Conditional Claims under FSSAI Regulations
1.1 “Natural” Conditional Claims
Under Condition 9(1), a product that is inherently high, low, or free of a nutrient may use a claim only if the nutrient’s name is preceded by “natural” or “naturally”—for example:
“a naturally low sodium food” or “a naturally fiber‑free food.”
This ensures consumers understand that the nutrient profile is inherent, not due to processing or reformulation.
1.2 Use of Descriptive Adjectives
Regulation further restricts words like “natural,” “fresh,” “pure,” “authentic,” “real,” etc. to cases where the product genuinely fulfills the criteria listed in Schedule V.
These rules prevent misuse of aspirational or emotional descriptors.
2. Prohibited Claims
FSSAI Regulation 10 outlines strict limitations:
2.1 Disease‑Prevention or Treatment Claims
2.2 Medical or Professional Endorsements
2.3 Misleading Added Nutrients
2.4 Special Medical or Dietary Foods
2.5 Fear‑Based or Doubt‑Inducing Claims
2.6 Risky Nutrient Levels
2.7 Undermining Competitors
3. Approval of Claims: When Is Prior Approval Needed?
Regulation 11 states:
If your intended claim is not defined or standardized, you must apply to FSSAI before using it.
4. Procedure for Approval of Claims
Regulation 12 defines a structured approval process:
4.1 Required Application Contents
Any application must include the following materials, along with prescribed fees:
4.2 Preliminary Scrutiny
FSSAI or an agency/panel appointed by it will conduct a preliminary review of the application.
4.3 Communication of Deficiencies
4.4 Non‑Refundable Fees
4.5 Final Order and Amendments
4.6 Use Restriction After Rejection
5. Redressal for Non‑Compliance
5.1 Penalty under Section 53
Any misleading or non-compliant claim triggers penalties up to ₹10 lakh under Section 53 of the FSSA, 2006
5.2 Non‑Compliance Procedure
5.3 Corrective Advertising
If violations occur, FSSAI can order the FBO to issue a corrective advertisement within 30 days, through the same medium to neutralize the misleading effect.
6. Why These Rules Matter
6.1 Protecting Public Health
By restricting disease-related claims and requiring scientific substantiation, FSSAI prevents unjustified medical claims, protecting individuals from false assurances.
6.2 Ensuring Transparency
Conditional claims like “natural” must reflect objective product characteristics—not marketing rhetoric.
6.3 Credible Marketing
Approval procedures ensure that only well-substantiated claims reach the market—promoting consumer confidence.
6.4 Fair Competition
Prohibiting claims that undermine competitors ensures a level playing field and prevents unfair disparagement.
7. Compliance Best Practices for Food Businesses
To fully comply and benefit from these regulations:
7.1 Build a Claims Dossier
7.2 Audit Existing Labels
7.3 Engage Subject Matter Experts
7.4 Submit Thorough Applications
7.5 Monitor FSSAI Updates
7.6 Prepare for Clarifications
7.7 Communicate Correctly If Claims Rejected
Conclusion
FSSAI’s regulatory framework on Conditional, Prohibited, and Approved Claims is comprehensive and rigorous. By enforcing:
The regulations strike a balance between protecting public health and enabling truthful, consumer-friendly marketing.
For food businesses, compliance isn’t a mere legal requirement—it’s a cornerstone of ethical branding, regulatory credibility, and sustainable consumer trust. Even as food science evolves, well-documented claims will stand firm in both courtrooms and kitchen counters.
Read more about this Regulation: Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018
Disclaimer: The information contained in this Article is intended solely for personal non-commercial use of the user who accepts full responsibility of its use. The information in the article is general in nature and should not be considered to be legal, tax, accounting, consulting or any other professional advice. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied regarding the accuracy, adequacy, reliability or completeness of any information on our page/article.